The Age Of Decluttering

An odd thing happened over the past year as I cleaned up my diet and changed my taste palate – I started to declutter the rest of my life too.

To most people, decluttering is a matter of throwing out old junk from the house. I did just that over the past few months as I finally got around to renovating my HDB flat for the first time since 2003, and fixing many of the things I implemented but didn’t know better back then.

For example, I custom-built a TV cabinet that was designed to hold an extremely heavy CRT TV and store as many DVDs and CDs as possible.

Who would know that over the next decade, TVs would become a fraction of the weight with LCD technology and that physical media would become obsolete?

Books, for me, have become a thing of the past as I moved to ebooks, freeing up an incredible amount of storage space. People say they miss the feel of paper under their fingertips. I say I don’t miss that yellowing piece of tree bark at all.

Another thing I learned over the past decade was that the more storage space I had, the more I would fill it with junk. So in 2014, I no longer have big cabinets or coffee tables in the living room. I have enough storage space to store the essential things, but every few weeks I’m going into my tiny storeroom to see what else I can throw out.

So one key trick in decluttering is preventing future clutter.

The next thing that I started to declutter was my social media life.

Continue reading The Age Of Decluttering

Higher aspirations, higher cost of living?

The 11 May 2014 article from Today newspaper
The 11 May 2014 article from Today newspaper

In recent years, I’ve been hearing this line “Control what you can control” more and more often. I think it’s a very useful line for time management and job prioritization but it is increasingly used when people are handed a lousy situation not of their own doing, and asked to “just deal with it”.

That thought came to mind when I read this news story in Today where our Defence Minister insists our cost of living here has become more expensive because of our personal aspirations in life:

SINGAPORE — Having higher aspirations in life is a reason why Singaporeans find the cost of living here expensive, despite real wages having gone up, said Defence Minister Dr Ng Eng Hen yesterday (May 10).

But Singapore has to ensure that opportunities to get out of poverty must not be priced out and remain abundant to fulfil the dreams of younger Singaporeans, said Dr Ng.

The Defence Minister was speaking at a Singapore Medical Association dinner and responding to a question from the audience concerned over the rising cost of living in Singapore.“If you look at household goods, per household, what people have – handphone, TV – has actually gone up,” said Dr Ng. Unlike the past, mobile phones are almost an essential item for children, he added.

That Singaporeans find costs of living expensive due to higher aspirations is a reason that will not please people, including himself, said Dr Ng, as the reason is “objective” and does not address “issues of the heart.”

Dr Ng added that while the Government makes sure that nobody should have their potential stunted just because their family cannot afford it, this is “difficult argument” to sell as some parents pay large sums of money to provide tuition for their children.

Before writing this post, I’ve actually spent the past three days mulling frequently on the story and on my personal situation.

I’ve asked myself – so is this true? Have my aspirations led to the increasing costs that we’re all experiencing around us? I’ve always respected Minister Ng (hey, he’s an old ACS boy, so he can’t be that clueless right?) so I kept asking myself if it was me and not him. Continue reading Higher aspirations, higher cost of living?

Bald girls, newer media, and motorcycle maintenance

Beginning this month, and hopefully on a weekly basis henceforth, I’ll be posting some thoughts on stuff that’s happening in my life or in my head. This blog site is eight years old this year, and has been sorely disused ever since Facebook decided to take over the world.

Apart from the usual fiery letter to the press about the education system or some part of society that has broken down (eg. public transport, COE system etc), I have been spending too much time micro-blogging or re-posting stuff on Facebook. At the same time, my writing skills are getting rusty again. The site design just got a brand new refresh with WordPress 3.6 so I thought this is a good time to blog properly again.

So here goes (please comment if you have time to keep me going :) Continue reading Bald girls, newer media, and motorcycle maintenance

Dispelling myths in dieting

Saucony Kinvara 3b
Nothing beats a good run if you want to burn calories.

In recent months, as I continued on my healthy diet and losing some more weight (I’ve lost 9-10kg in the past six months, depending on which hour of the day I weigh in), I’ve observed more friends switching to a healthy diet too. That’s encouraging and also indicative of how we are more conscious of our health issues in our 30s.

Or maybe because I’ve scared too many people with my constant Facebook updates on diet and exercise.

There are some common issues though, which I hope to provide my own perspective. Continue reading Dispelling myths in dieting

The root issues of our education system

Hard truths screenshot

This post has been edited and published in Today, 26 Mar 2013, under the headline “Hard truths of our education system”. Screenshot above.

Recently, a young mother asked me how one should prepare their children for the tough problem sums found in primary school mathematics.

Her father, a successful businessman, chimed in: “Why do parents have to go for classes to learn how to teach their children? That’s the teacher’s job! The job of parents is to go out and earn money to feed the family!”

The Education Minister recently expounded on the myriad of issues surrounding education during the Committee of Supply debate in Parliament. He mentioned a need to go back to basics, and it couldn’t be truer.

However, going back to basics requires an honest assessment of what’s truly broken, instead of asking parents to manage their expectations and to strive for school-work-life balance.

The situation isn’t as complex as the Ministry believes, because the many issues raised all lead back to a few root causes that are not being given enough emphasis by policymakers.

Roles need to be clear

Let’s ignore the unreasonable demands from “kiasu” parents and be explicitly clear about the roles we play : Parents are not teachers. Teachers are not supermen. Tutors are meant to help weak students, not raise the benchmark of top students to silly levels.

While parents should be considered “partners in education”, it is alarming when the time students spend in school is deemed insufficient for them to master the curriculum, hence the need for parents and tuition teachers to be constantly coaching them late into the night.

If you ask why everyone has to play an educator’s role today, it’s really because of the unrealistic curriculum.

Teach less, learn less, grow more.

The primary school curriculum is a topic that the Education Ministry has yet to publicly acknowledge as a a critical problem, despite much public outcry for reform. While the Ministry wants to encourage creativity, it is impossible when children are drowned with a huge range of topics.

The question educators need to ask themselves is – “How much does a child really need to learn to be a well-rounded individual?”

The Minister recently said that parents should not compare our curriculum today with that of the past. So how is it that we had less topics to study in the 1980s and 1990s, and that had no adverse effect on our lives today? Many of us have adapted to today’s technologies and business landscape without a hiccup.

Meanwhile, I see today’s kids lacking sleep because they simply cannot catch up with the sheer volume of things they have to remember. They learn more, but remember little.

Teachers keep saying “teach less, learn more” and some end up leaving the bulk of the teaching to parents and tutors. Perhaps let’s change it to “teach less, learn less, grow more”.

Also, if we truly believe in meritocracy, then any hardworking child armed with an MOE-approved textbook should be able to excel at the school exam without needing tuition or a stack of assessments books with questions of exceptional difficulty.

Celebrate achievements, not diminish them

While we need to reduce the sheer volume of tested topics, we also need to stop barking up the wrong trees in the same spirit of meritocracy.

The recent move to stop publishing the names of PSLE top scorers may do more harm than good in the long run.

Whether education is a “marathon” or a “sprint”, we should celebrate those who are able to excel, without letting schools obsess with the school ranking exercise.

Ask yourself, which athlete pushes himself to the maximum only to have his achievements disappear in a sea of political correctness? Who wants to take the marathon seriously then?

We desperately need to give more breathing space to the average student, but we should not diminish the achievements of the truly gifted or those who have overcome the odds to do their best.

Let’s speak English well. Please.

MPs recently debated about the falling popularity of literature, but nobody ever mentioned that students may actually fear the subject because of their poor grasp of the English language.

Yes, our top students do well in global tests and in Ivy League universities, but let’s also recognize that the average standard of English communication in Singapore leaves much to be desired.

Many young graduates are unable to switch out of Singlish into proper English at will, and good grammar is often lacking at the workplace.

The root causes are the continued emphasis on bilingualism and the poor understanding of how to teach English in our schools. For English exams, the key tenets of fluency, brevity and impact have been replaced by flowery words and much hubris. Children memorize colorful phrases to insert into every possible sentence.

The result is that many citizens don’t speak English or their mother tongue well, and that is a national tragedy.

If we are serious about improving the education system, then let’s not shy away from tackling the hard truths of our situation today.

Why the PAP got Hammered in Punggol East

The news is out – Workers’ Party won over 54% of the votes in Punggol East while the PAP only garnered about 43%. It was not unexpected though, because some key trends were glaringly clear throughout the short hustings period. You’ll read plenty of analyses in the media this coming week, but I thought I’d get ahead of the pack first.

(I won’t even bother to write about Reform Party or Singapore Democratic Alliance because all they did was to waste their own elections deposits and everyone’s time with their poorly thought-out campaigns and rhetoric.)

In highly connected Singapore, elections are now run on social media. The rallies’ real impact was created when shared virally. And Dr Koh’s “Everyone has a car” quote may have been out of context but damaged his campaign more than anything else IMO.

The influence of traditional media was minimal unless they are fully online like Today, which did an excellent job of tweeting updates and doing follow up reports.

What the PAP needs is a truly strong communications expert who is able to strategize every bit of their PR. It can’t be an old media “expert” but someone who knows how to wield and shape online sentiment. Right now, it’s pretty obvious that person has not been hired yet. I remember before GE2011, the PAP brushed off online comments as “Internet chatter” and I wrote that they’ll regret that.

PAP folks post a lot on Facebook but never respond to any comments. So they shouldn’t even bother because they’re treating FB like it’s a print newspaper.

The big guns no longer have any major impact on the vote. Everyone from the PM to Kee Chiew came down to Punggol, and the more they said, the angrier the people got (at least online). The population of Punggol is younger than most mature estates, and the young people are fed up with all the wrong policies of the past 15 years. The residents are also immune to all the Gahmen announcements on transport, Baby Bonus and housing fixes being trotted out in the space of one week. Too much and too late.

The PAP has long prided itself on incorruptibility and integrity. Then their rising star Michael Palmer messed himself and his party in the worst possible way. You can wear white clothes, but you need to practice what you preach. That is why the PAP’s old mantra of being clean has lost much of its power over the people.

Li Lian represented the common Singaporean facing all the daily bread and butter issues. Dr Koh represented yet another rich guy the PAP wanted to parachute into the Cabinet. Seriously, who do you think the people want to vote for? Sob stories of a poor childhood do nothing if you have two cars.

There is still much resentment on the ground after GE2011 – a general sense that nothing has really improved today. Wages have lagged behind costs. Frequent breakdowns of the MRT remind people of forced overcrowding and poor transport management. Sky high COEs remind people of inflation. The education system reminds parents that children are unnecessarily stressed. Is this the country that the PAP has built where only the rich can be happy?

In the space of a by-election, it was impossible to deal with all those major issues, though some attempts were made. Even with the pay cut, our PAP ministers are still earning a lot (and we don’t know the extent of their performance bonuses). The issues we face are not the same issues they face.

That’s why whether it is a by-election or general election, it’s about connecting with the voter lah. So simple, yet so difficult when you don’t have to take the train to work.

WordPress Jetpack Gallery Test

Testing the new Jetpack gallery feature in WordPress. I’m amazed how well it lays out the pix. Sorry if you’re sick of my Ducati Monster :)

Public transport and the lack of discourse

A scene from the Bishan MRT platform during the train system breakdown on 15th Dec. Photo from AFP

I just spent two weeks in Hong Kong and Penang, and it was during this time that two things happened in the Singapore public transport system – Comfort DelGro changed its fare taxi structure and SMRT suffered two consecutive days of train breakdowns on its Circle and N-S lines. Both things sparked off citizen fury on different levels, and what is remarkable is how little the Govt. has stepped in to moderate public sentiment, as well as its own image after the recent poor showing at the General Elections.

Transport is always a hot potato in Singapore for several reasons, and these are not being tackled correctly by the people in charge.

Continue reading Public transport and the lack of discourse